|
 Just Peacemaking: The New Paradigm for the Ethics of War and Peace The Pilgrim Press, 2008 Glen Stassen, Editor Twenty-three
Christian ethicists, international relations scholars, conflict
resolution specialists, theologians, one New Testament scholar, and a
handful of Peace Action leaders, worked for five years to create the
new just peacemaking theory. Thirty scholars reached consensus on the
new paradigm for the third edition, published in 2008. We believe this
may be a breakthrough time, after the Cold War and when people need a
roadmap for peacemaking, and during the time when countering the threat
of terrorism mostly by making war, and threatening war, against various
Muslim nations, has dramatically increased anger against the United
States, as shown in The Pew Global Survey, and dramatically increased
recruiting to terrorism, as shown in the U.S. Counterterrorism Agency,
U.S. Department of State, annual count of international terrorist
incidents:
• 208 terrorist attacks caused 625 deaths in 2003; • 3,168 attacks caused 1,907 deaths in 2004. • 11,111 attacks caused 14,602 deaths in 2005. • 14,500 attacks caused 20,745 deaths in 2006. • Approximately 14,500 attacks caused 22,605 deaths in 2007.
Former
Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld has mused that more terrorists are being
recruited than the United States is killing or capturing. The agreed
assessment by the 16 U.S. intelligence agencies in 2006 says U.S.
actions against Arab Muslims are increasing anger and increasing
terrorist incidents and training for terrorism. War and torture work:
they work to cause widespread anger and to create increasing numbers of
terrorists.
Surely we need a new approach that gets at causes of
anger and of recruiting to terrorism. We see ten key practices of
peacemaking that have been developing ever since World War II working
effectively here and there to eliminate potential wars, and to halt
terrorism, as in Northern Ireland and in Turkey’s struggle with PKK
terrorism, which had killed 30,000 people but is now basically ended.
These
just peacemaking practices are in fact growing stronger, and are
intertwining in some major areas of the world to make war there very
unlikely. They are spreading, but need citizen pressure to spread more
quickly and more strongly. Places like Serbia and Rwanda prove the
point: the ten practices had not penetrated there yet, and war did
result.
We believe debates between pacifism and just war theory,
while needed, are insufficient. Debates need to focus not only on
whether to bomb, whether to make a war, but on what initiatives should
be taken to avoid war and spread peace. For that, we need a third
paradigm in the debate–just peacemaking theory. To have a well-focused
debate, with people in different churches and different regions talking
about the same criteria and thus strengthening the impact of the
message, we need an agreed paradigm with clearly known practices of
peacemaking that are scripturally grounded and that have been proven to
be effective historically in preventing wars. With an agreed paradigm,
we can point together to the same needed peacemaking practices.
We
believe people need a new organizing vision for effective peacemaking
to take the place of confusion about what peacemaking means after the
cold war. We believe the ten practices that we have identified and
described can provide that vision. We published the results of our work
in September, 1998, in a book by Pilgrim Press, Just Peacemaking: Ten
Practices for Abolishing War. We are not so naive as to think we can
abolish war totally next year, but we do have the empirical evidence
from the best international relations scholars that the ten
practices are already abolishing numerous wars in several regions of
the world. We want people to start thinking of abolishing wars, and
understanding how we can be effective in pushing in that direction. The
book was soon republished in a second edition in 2004, and then, with
thirty scholars agreeing, in a third edition, Just Peacemaking: The New
Paradigm for the Ethics of Peace and War (Pilgrim: 2008).
Those
who developed the paradigm include Paul Schroeder, the best historian
of international relations there is, Bruce Russett of Yale, the
outstanding International Relations professor at Yale who was the
advisor for the Catholic Bishops' pastoral letter, The Challenge of
Peace, the main authors of the church statements on peace in the
1980's, Steven Brion Meisels, chair of Peace Action, the Christian
ethicists who wrote books arguing we need a just peacemaking theory,
and others. It has been something like a miracle that scholars so
diverse reached such thorough consensus. The new paradigm is designed
so it can be supported by people of good will from different faiths and
no stated faith. Now leading Muslim and Jewish scholars have reached
agreement that just peacemaking is the ethic we need; together we are
developing a trifaith just peacemaking paradigm. See http://www.usip.org/pubs/specialreports/sr214.html.
You
may find additional essays in the Journal of the Society of Christian
Ethics 23/1 (Spring/Summer 2003) by Martin L. Cook, "Just Peacemaking:
Challenges of Humanitarian Intervention"; Lisa Sowle Cahill, "Just
Peacemaking: Theory, Practice, and Prospects"; Simeon O. Ilesanmi, "So
that Peace May Reign: A Study of Just Peacemaking Experiments in
Africa"; Charles Kimball, "The Just Peacemaking Paradigm and Middle
East Conflicts;" Ronald H. Stone, "Realist Criticism of Just
Peacemaking Theory"; Theodore J. Koontz and Michael L.
Westmoreland-White, "A Just Peacemaking Bibliography." New articles and
book chapters discussing just peacemaking theory are being published
every year. I know of sixty such articles by now, and of course others
are being published that I do not know of. Truly Just Peacemaking is
the new paradigm for the ethics of peace and war. Any ethic that
discusses only pacifism and just war theory is out of date.
(Return to Glen
Stassen's Resource Page)
|